Two sisters who are believed to be foremost deaf female
paedophiles in Britain have been informed to expect “very significant sentences” for
sexually molesting a six-year-old boy.
According to sources, the infant boy was sexually abused for
about 14 year period by the Julie Fellows aged 30, and her sister Jennifer, 32.
According to Worcester Crown Court the sisters first started
abusing the boy when he was aged six in 2000.
Julie was 14-years-old when she lured the boy into a petrol
station toilets where she touched her private parts.
On another occasion she performed oral sex on the youngster,
the court heard.
Julie was found guilty following a trial of indecently
assaulting a boy aged six to nine between October 2000 and April 2004 in
Leominster, and sexual activity with a boy aged 14 -16 between October 2008 and
October 2010 in Hereford.
Jennifer admitted indecently assaulting a boy aged six to
nine between October 2000 and April 2004 in Leominster and inciting sexual
activity with a boy aged 14-16 between October 2008 and October 2010 in
Kington.
Meanwhile, according to Prosecutor Simon Phillips: “The
allegations date back many years and the more serious of them when Julie was 14
and the victim was six.
“The behaviour was so frequent it became routine and he
thought it was the norm.”
“Julie later moved in with her fiancé Adam and the victim
was sitting on the sofa with Julie watching TV while Adam was asleep,” the
prosecutor continued.
“She started a conversation with him about what used to
happen and she put his hand down her trousers.
“She told him he needed to lose his virginity and said ‘Who
would you rather lose it
to?’.
“She got him to get on his knees and they had intercourse
for a short period of time. She was between 22 and 24 and he was 14.
“There were no further instances of intercourse but further
instances of touching.”
However, the sexual molestation stopped finally, when victim
narrated his experience to his friends and later realised, it was not a “normal
behaviour”, the court heard.
Mr Phillips added: “The victim faced great difficulties ad
relationships became difficult. He faced emotional turmoil and turned to drinking
and drugs.
“He went to the police and Jennifer denied anything
happened.
“Julie remembered the inappropriate behaviour between her
and the victim.
“She agreed she, Jennifer, the boy and another played
boyfriend and girlfriend games which involved kissing. She denied sexual
intercourse ever took place.”
Adam Western, defending, told the court Julie is pregnant
and due to give birth in January.
According to him: “The effect of immediate imprisonment on
this young woman would be so severe that your honour should avoid it.
“She would be so isolated in prison, couple with the fact
that she is pregnant and her due date is in January.
“The pregnancy is likely to be complicated because of the
tragic way her last pregnancy ended.”
Although Mr Western did not elaborate on how Julie’s last
pregnancy ended.
The sisters, of Kington, Herefordshire, were told by Judge
Robert Juckes via sign language interpreters: “This is not a straightforward
case. You should expect very significant prison sentences.
“You are both well aware of the terms of your bail. I am
sorry it can’t be concluded today but there are a number of matters I need to
consider.”
Judge Juckes bailed the pair and adjourned sentencing until
August 19.
No comments:
Write comments