INDIA: 22 HIV positive children adopted by Rajib Thomas and are living with him, wife and two biological children

INDIA: 22 HIV positive children adopted by Rajib Thomas and are living with him, wife and two biological children

News Unknown   09:26

About 22 HIV infected children who were abandoned by their parents have adopted by an Indian man named Rajib Thomas aka Papa Reji and has been caring for their well-being for about 10 years now.

The 44-year-old philanthropist lives with all the children, wife and two biological children in house. They all live happily as his wife happily in charge of cooking for all the children, while he takes care of their education and healthcare needs

‘It was the year 2007 when I met an HIV-positive girl outside a hospital and she asked me to get some noodles for her,’ he said. ‘I couldn’t get it that day but promised to come back again.

‘The next day when I went there, I got to know that the girl was no more. I was devastated after hearing the news, so it was then that I thought of doing something for these children.’

The incident later made Papa Reji to consult an HIV/AIDS expert Divya Mithale of his intention to adopt for him to take in two abandoned babies.

‘In 2009, I rented a bigger space for my wife and two children, and my other two HIV-positive newborns,’ he said.

‘Initially it was tough to make ends meet, but we survived the hardships by giving up comfort and helping the children.

‘Gradually people started donating mattresses, food and money when they saw us working for these children.

‘My family of four slowly expanded to 24, as more and more children with HIV were sent to me from different hospitals.’

Mini added: ‘We make sure that none of the children feel left out at home. We scold all of them as much we love them.

‘We celebrate their birthdays here and take immediate care when someone falls sick.’

Papa Reji is visibly proud of his ever-growing family, and says they have become his life’s purpose.

‘These children all call me Papa and it is the duty of a father to protect his children,’ he said. ‘So I am not doing anything extraordinary – just taking care of my children.’

Boyfriend exposes himself to his partner after he erroneously posted on Burger King website as one cheating

Boyfriend exposes himself to his partner after he erroneously posted on Burger King website as one cheating

News Unknown   09:17

Boy’s casual comment on social media stirs his girlfriend’s anger. The comment was all about a picture which was posted by Burger King, saying he had previously been with a different girl. Though the whole scenario was misunderstood by his girlfriend.

Posting a comment on a photo published by Burger King, Instagram user @jordan_vonsmith86 complained about the fast food giant's service, saying: "My girl legit took 20 minutes ordering in the drive thru last night, those whoppers were worth it tho lol"

An apparently blameless comment. Nevertheless then came another comment... seemingly from his girlfriend.

She wrote asking "Umm excuse me @jordan_vonsmith86??? I don't recall going last night or ever liking Burger King who you are talking about?

Situation got worse, when @kitcass01 also expressed her unhappy state with him, saying "please don't bring me into this", she commented.

Yet that did not excuse her from the whole messy situation, it didn't, as Jordan's girlfriend took it upon herself to reply: "F*** you, you brought yourself into this you fat b****."

The situation then made Shanlee to tag some of her friends to make their input, as they said he had been spotted with different girls in the past.

Thus, Instagram users are logging on to Burger King's Instagram account just to witness how the argument turned out, but they appear to have been deleted - much to their disappointment.

aminebattas wrote: "Where are the comments of the couple fighting lol i wanna know what happened later"

vicarondo was totally honest, commenting: "Whose (sic) only here because they've read about the couple breaking up on here somewhere."

Of course, some people are cynical and think the two accounts have been created by Burger King to generate publicity.

ggomez_89 commented: "Burger king making up bullshit stories for publicity. The couples accounts are faker than the meat in your burgers."

This woman tried to cut off her ex-husband’s intestines after four-hour of marathon s3x

This woman tried to cut off her ex-husband’s intestines after four-hour of marathon s3x

News Unknown   10:24

Man 31 tells court how his former wife (dayla Saeed) aged 35 attempted to disembowel him after they both had a 4 hour marathon sex session with a knife in a bid to destroy his intestines.

The court was also told that the husband (Mr Miah’) small bowel was disengaged from other members of his body thrown on the carpet in the bedroom.

After the man narrated his ordeal to the court, and how he desperately made some efforts to push back his entrails into his belly, but the woman debunked all the accusations levelled against her, at a Crown Court in Birmingham.

Giving evidence, Mr Miah added: ‘suddenly in the blink of an eye, and I didn’t see the knife, she stabbed me twice in the belly.

‘I can only assume the knife came from either under the bed or the pocket of her dressing gown.

‘My intestines were out, everything was out and she was grabbing hold of them, trying to pull them.

‘She broke one of them and threw it onto the floor but I managed to put the rest of them back in my belly.’

He went further to tell the court how he tried to run out his flat, yet the ex-wife still pursued him to the road, as she used a wooden object to attack him.

He however became lucky when neighbours sighted him at about 3am by a doorway as he was screaming, and called the police.

According to Prosecutor Adam Western: ‘The cuts were so severe part of his small bowel ended up on the carpet.

‘She caused his injuries. Her intention was nothing less than to kill him.’

Though Mr Miah on his part accepted during cross-examination by her barrister Patrick Upward QC that he had been physically and verbally abusive towards her during their two-year Islamic marriage.

The jury also heard ex couples had been at risk of being deported as illegal immigrants.

Mr Miah first came into Britain in 2010 as a student, but was tagged as an illegal immigrant after dropping out of college, while his ex-wife was granted asylum in 2012.

The court heard Mr Miah spent four months in a detention centre in 2012 but was allowed to stay because he has a child in the UK.

ARKANSAS: New law empowers rapists to sue their victims if they make any attempt to abort the baby

ARKANSAS: New law empowers rapists to sue their victims if they make any attempt to abort the baby

News Unknown   09:44

Wonders shall never end as the US state of Arkansas passes a law empowering rapists to sue their victims if they make any attempt to abort their baby.

The new law is expected to take place sometime during spring, will make family members to stop a lady’s termination by suing the abortion provider.

However the worrying part of the coming law is that it does not include any exception to matrimonial rape nor incest – which means, the supposed father of the foetus can sue the woman even if she was being raped.

Speaking on the issue, Arkansas representative Andy Mayberry, who is also a signatory to the Arkansas Act 45, journalists that though the baby’s father (rapist) would be able to stop the process, they the law would not allow them to claim any monetary compensations for damages caused in rape or incest cases.

‘There is zero part of me that understands why a rapist or someone who got pregnant against their will, maybe incest, would have any right in that decision,’ Karen Musick, co-founder of Arkansas’s Abortion Support Network, told the Beast.

‘I cannot wrap my brain around the fact that there would be anyone who thinks otherwise.’

Act 45 also bans dilation and evacuation procedures – the safest and most common procedure carried out during the second trimester of pregnancy, being used in around 95% of cases.

Now, using the D&E procedure could be punishable by a $10,000 (£8,006) fine or six years in prison.

This effectively blocks abortions after the 14-week mark, as it has criminalised the safest procedure.

Woman forced to squeeze her breast by an airport official

Woman forced to squeeze her breast by an airport official

News Unknown   14:03

A 33-year-old mum named Gayathiri Boss who is currently breastfeeding her baby narrates how airport officials forced her to squeeze her breast to prove she is actually a breastfeeding mum. The lady flew from Singapore to Europe with her breast pump.

In any case, she says that when she touched base at Frankfurt Airport, security staff seemed suspicious, asking where her infant was whether it truly was a breast pump.

According to Ms Bose she was taken into a side room by an authority and addressed concerning why her youngsters, aged 3 and 7 months, weren't on the flight with her.

‘She asked me to open up my blouse and show her my breast,’ she told the BBC. ‘She then asked how come I didn’t have anything attached to my breast, if I was lactating and expressing breastmilk,” said Ms Bose.

‘And I said, there is no such thing that is [permanently] attached, we usually place the pump to our nipple and the machine does the job.

'She wanted me to show her by hand-expressing a bit.'

She did what she was asked in light of the fact that she said she 'didn't know what might transpire on the off chance that they chose to raise hell for me', and she expected to get on a connecting flight to Paris.

In any case, she said the experience was "humiliating" and left her in tears, and that she would look for lawful guidance.

Christian Altenhofen, from the government police unit at the airplane terminal, told the BBC he couldn't remark on the particular episode.

In any case, he said these sorts of tests for a breastfeeding mother are unmistakably excluded in standard practice.

However he said 'On the off chance that a speculated hazardous is recognized at an air wellbeing control point, the things and the individual must be sought,'.

                                   

A single mum of 8 says she can no longer cope with £500 benefit, saying the children may end up roaming on the street.

A single mum of 8 says she can no longer cope with £500 benefit, saying the children may end up roaming on the street.

News Unknown   10:43

Hardship knocking on the door of a single mother of 8 who said the £2000 being given to her by the government is not enough for her to provide the needs of the family.

The 31-year-old mother whose children are aged between 12 years to 2 months lives in a three-bedroom housing association house in Selly Oak, Birmingham has lamented that the house is too small for them to live in, and has put an application for a bigger house.

Marie Buchan also stated that her benefits have been reduce to £500 from £582 per week as a result of the benefit cap introduced by the government, as a result, she has been struggling to survive with her children.

Due to the hardship she faces, the Miss Buchan now owes her landlord about £2000, and is being worried that she may likely be evicted because of her inability to pay the outstanding rents.

She stated: 'The benefit cap has hit me hard - money is very tight.  I am £82-a-week worse off and, when you have eight children, every penny counts.

'I don’t waste my money - everything goes on my children. It is tough bringing up eight children on your own, a constant battle.

'I feel the threat of eviction all the time. I have already been to court once due to rent arrears and I fear I may be dragged there again.

'I am scrimping and saving to try to get the arrears down but it is very difficult.'

Miss Buchan's monetary issues are intensified by the way that she owes £600 in bus path fines subsequent to getting ten tickets for straying in bus paths in Birmingham downtown area in three days.

She says she was gotten in bus paths while searching for a parking spot when taking her child, Olivia, to hospital for treatment for bronchiolitis.

Miss Buchan, an occupant of Bourneville Village Trust in the south-west of Birmingham, used to get £385 seven days in child tax credit, £100 child benefit and £97 pay income support.

Be that as it may, the benefit cap, presented recently by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) to lessen the weight on the state, restricted her handouts to £500 seven days.

Miss Buchan, whose association with her previous partner and father of every one of her kids finished for the current year, has youngsters Tia, 12, Leah, 11, Latoya, 8, Joshua, 7, Alisha, 5, Mikayla, 3, Amelia, 2, and two-month-old Olivia.

She lays down with three of her kids in one room of her £200,000 semi, while another four share a moment room and Joshua has the third to himself.

Miss Buchan placed on the waiting list for about 4 bedroom house, but was deleted from the list when she fell short of her current rent.

A DWP representative stated: 'The benefit cap sets a fair limit to what people can expect to get from the welfare system.

'Claimants cannot receive more than £500 a week, the average household earnings.

'We have been working with claimants for 18 months to help them prepare for the cap.

'Already 18,000 people potentially affected have been helped into work, as those receiving working tax credits are exempt.'

Bournville Village Trust representative stated: 'It is normal policy for social housing landlords not to transfer households to larger properties when there are rent arrears, especially of this level.'