British Prime Minister Theresa May suffers another defeat,
as peers on Tuesday supported an amendment to the Brexit bill with a total vote
of 366 against 268. As a result, peers have been accused for attempting to frustrate
Brexit.
The amendment suggests that Theresa May should bring to the
floor of the parliament any deal reached with the EU for approval by both
houses of parliament before implementing it.
The amendment also states that, Mrs May would require the
prior approval of MPs and Lords if she decides to conclude talks "without
an agreement as to the applicable terms".
Remarkably, Tuesday’s defeat is the second time in a week
the Lords have defeated the Brexit bill - on Wednesday a Labour amendment
demanding protection for EU citizens in the UK was passed by a majority of 102.
Brexit Secretary David Davis said the outcome of the
amendment vote was "disappointing".
He said: "(The bill) has a straightforward purpose - to
enact the referendum result and allow the Government to get on with negotiating
a new partnership with the EU.
"It is clear that some in the Lords would seek to
frustrate that process and it is the Government's intention to ensure that does
not happen.
"We will now aim to overturn these amendments in the
House of Commons."
This second amendment has been seen by one time Lib Dem
leader Paddy Ashdown, as an opportunity for the Commons to give their decision
a second thought.
Lord Ashdown speaking to Sky News said: "This is about
the sovereignty of Parliament, the Prime Minister was trying to get away
without Parliament having a say - we've insisted it should.
"What else is democracy about?"
He added: "The Government have abused the people's
vote, they have hijacked the Brexit referendum result for the hardest possible
Brexit, the one that leaves us the most distant from the European Union."
With the Prime Minister vowing to trigger Article 50 before
the end of March, senior peers now expect "ping pong" on Monday, with
the Lords amendments being debated - and thrown out - by MPs in the Commons in
the afternoon.
The bill would then return to the Lords that evening, when
peers are expected to end their demands for changes and allow the legislation
to reach the statute book.
No comments:
Write comments