Chaos as suspected terrorist attack brings Arian Grande gig to an abrupt end

Chaos as suspected terrorist attack brings Arian Grande gig to an abrupt end

World Unknown   10:35

Wailing and mourning in Manchester after a suspect terrorist attack left 19 persons dead, while 50 persons have sustained different degree of injuries’

The police in Greater Manchester has announced that the tragedy would be handled as an alleged terror attack.

According to eye witnesses a "huge bang" was heard at the 21,000-capacity venue at the end of a sell-out Ariana Grande gig.

The US singer, who was unharmed, tweeted to say she is "broken".

"From the bottom of my heart, I am so, so sorry," she said. "I don't have words."

Her manager Scooter Braun said they mourned "the lives of children and loved ones taken by this cowardly act".

Accordingly, the city’s Victoria station has been closed after evacuating everyone and cancelling train services.

Residents in the city have been offering shelter to all those who went to the concert, even as taxi drivers offered to render free rides, while one of the hotel close to the venue has provided shelter for several children.

Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham in his tweet handle said: "My heart goes out to families who have lost loved ones, my admiration to our brave emergency services. A terrible night for our great city."

Theresa May in her message said her thoughts were with the victims and families of those affected and has condemned "what is being treated by the police as an appalling terrorist attack".

Home Secretary Amber Rudd also condemned the "barbaric act" and said: "The full details of exactly what happened are still emerging, but I am proud of the police and first responders who reacted to this tragic incident so swiftly."

"Our thoughts and prayers go out to everyone affected and especially the families who lost their loved ones tonight - utterly heart-breaking," they said.

If it at the end is confirmed that the attack was an act of terrorism, the explosion will become the worst atrocity in the UK since the deaths of the 56 people killed in the 7/7 London bombings in 2005.

Battle line drawn, as Theresa May perfects plans to give Brussels Britain’s Brexit divorce bill

Battle line drawn, as Theresa May perfects plans to give Brussels Britain’s Brexit divorce bill

World Unknown   06:07

In a response to the huge Brexit divorce bill levelled against the United Kingdom, Theresa May’s led government has also concluded plan to hit Brussels with a huge Brexit bill.

According to the PM, Brussels is also owing Britain several billions of pounds as a result of its share of the European Investment Bank and other joint projects.

Speaking to the Sunday Telegraph the PM mentioned that “money paid in the past” by the UK must be taken into account in any final financial settlement.

The Prime Minister also acknowledged that the UK had financial “rights” which must be respected during Brexit negotiations about payments as well as “obligations” to the EU as it leaves.

The PM’s intervention is a clear refusal of hardline EU countries who have contended that the UK should not get back its proportion of EU assets.

According to the PM: “There is much debate about what the UK’s obligations might be or indeed what our rights might be in terms of money being paid in in the past. We make it clear that we would look at those both rights and obligations.”

“There’s the investment bank, there’s the investment fund, and there are various areas. This will be, as you know, an important part of the negotiations.”

The comment is the first time the Prime Minister has indicated publicly she wants to keep a share of the European Investment Bank.

It was also reported by Government sources that the UK’s share of the bank has been estimated at 16 per cent - which equals to around £8.5 billion.

British Foreign Secretary confirms that Britain has no plan to hinder EU defence co-operation

British Foreign Secretary confirms that Britain has no plan to hinder EU defence co-operation

World Unknown   13:37

In a swift reaction to the allegation levelled against him, the UK’s Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson has come out to clear the air saying the UK is not seeking to block closer European Union military co-operation. Mr Johnson instead made affirmed that Britain is "not going to stand in their way".

Though he affirmed the UK’s concerns over "some of the language" he insisted that the UK would not look to reject efforts being made to forge deeper defence ties.

This report comes as a it was told the UK was making some efforts to put the brakes on the planned command centre as a result of objections to it being mentioned as an" operational headquarters".

Upon his arrival for the summit in Brussels, Mr Johnson stressed that: "We understand the vital importance to us all as European countries working together to strengthen our defences.

"We all want to see our European friends and partners spending more on defence. If they can get up to 2%, that is terrific. We really want to encourage that as fast as possible.

"If they want to come together with other arrangements, we are not going to stand in their way.

"We are just working on some of the language to make sure that we get it totally right."

A lady who living disability benefit confronts Mrs May in the open, telling her £100 a month is not enough for her

A lady who living disability benefit confronts Mrs May in the open, telling her £100 a month is not enough for her

World Unknown   10:59

British Prime Minister confronted publicly by a furious lady living on disability benefit in Abingdon, Oxfordshire as she points out to Mrs May that: "I can't live on £100 a month."

She stopped Mrs May in the town's market, telling her the "fat cats get the money and us lot get nothing".

She added: "I'm talking about everybody. Everybody who's got mental health - and everybody who's got learning disabilities - I want them not to have their money taken away from them and being crippled."

Because so many people complain that the move from disability allowances to PIPs (Personal Independence Payment) has left them struggling to get by.

"I want my disability living allowance to come back, not have PIPs and get nothing. I can't live on £100 a month," Ms Mohan said.

"Who's going to help me?" she pleaded.

The exchange happened as the PM was walking through a market with the constituency's Tory candidate, Nicola Blackwood.

Mrs May made some efforts to reassure Ms Mohan, telling her: "Nicola can help you specifically. What I can do is ensure we're giving more help to people with mental health and learning disabilities.

"And that's exactly what we've done, we made an announcement the other day... When we look at the help we give to people with any disability, it's particularly we focus on those who are most in need."

PIPs payments currently vary from around £22 a week to £141.10, and depends on the severity of a person's disability.

When they were being introduced, the Institute for Fiscal Studies predicted 370,000 people would be affected, leaving them each an average of £3,500 worse off.

David Davis insists the UK will not need the ECJ after Brexit

David Davis insists the UK will not need the ECJ after Brexit

World Unknown   08:05

ITV host asserts even after the Britain finally leaves the EU, the European courts would still be necessary.

This was said as reaction to the Brexit Secretary David Davis, after he stated that the UK would no longer need the services of the European Courts, as he attacks those saying British courts were good enough to sort out the effect Brexit.

The Brexit was also resolute about a rational deal over the rights of all EU nationals living in the UK, and British nationals living in other EU nations.

 Mr Davis also confirmed how he will "have an argument" with Michel Barnier on how to deal with EU citizens after Brexit.

On his part, Mr Barnier has also said that the European Court of Justice "must absolutely" oversee the rights of EU citizens in the UK after the country leaves the bloc.

Conversely, Mr Davis ripped into this red line and said Britain will not stand for it ahead of his planned meeting with Mr Barnier at the end of June.

He told Peston: "There will be arguments over fine detail such as whether the European Court of Justice oversees these rights after we've left."

When pressed by Peston on the "need for the ECJ", Mr Davis hit back: "We are not prepared to accept that. We'll have an argument about that.

"The simple truth is that we are leaving, we are going to be outside the reach of the European court. We do not want the ECJ getting involved in our affairs.

"I take slight offence to the idea that the Supreme Court couldn't oversee this. We have very good courts in this country."

 Britain's Secretary for leaving the EU stressed that the British public voted for a future without the single market, the customs union, the European Court of Justice, and returned control over immigration.

Mr Davis added: "Both sides knew that if we leave, we leave it all!

"We are seeking a comprehensive free trade agreement covering all products and alls services, and a customs agreement to go along that.

"We want the most beneficial economic outcome while respecting the referendum."

Later in the interview, Mr Davis mocked those who claimed a bad deal with the EU was better than no deal.

He told Peston: "Nobody wants no deal, but you need the option. We have to the option to walk away, or else we will be blackmailed.

"When you go buy a house and say I will buy this house no matter what, you'll be charged a fortune!"

Theresa May still determined to cut net migration to the tens of thousand despite her party's failure on the issue

Theresa May still determined to cut net migration to the tens of thousand despite her party's failure on the issue

World Unknown   06:51

Despite their inability to meet their net immigration target to date, former Home Secretary and now British Prime Minister Theresa May has once again reassured the British people that her party is still on course in trying to reduce net migration to the “tens of thousands”.

It was very obvious that the issue of immigration was the major factor that made the British people to vote in favour of Brexit, thus several leave voters have welcomed the Tories promise regarding the issue.

During an interview with the Home Secretary, she was asked if the “tens of thousands” figure that appeared in the 2015 manifesto would be repeated in the 2017 document, she said: “It’s not going to be identical to the last one. We’re setting it out for hopefully a five year term, we’ve got a lot to think through to work out what’s the best way to deliver on our priorities.

"My personal view is we need to continue to bring immigration down.

"I want to make sure that we do it in a way that supports businesses - you know we're ending freedom of movement when we leaving the European Union.

"So the situation from that time the [2015] manifesto... has changed because we're leaving the European Union, so it's right that we look at it again."

Though some fears were raised by various businesses that such a measure is likely to bring about labour shortage in certain key sectors of the British economy, but Ms Rudd said firms should “do more” to try to hire workers from the UK.

Earlier this year it emerged that just one in 50 of the applications received by sandwich chain Pret a Manger were from applicants from the UK.

Moreover, in March, the company told a committee of MPs that they could face a labour shortage after Brexit but last month, the firm’s chief executive Clive Schlee said a new drive to hire British workers had shown “very encouraging” results.

Ms Rudd said: "I did hear that Pret a Manger had come out and said it's absolutely essential for us to have European workers because if we don't we're going to have to make more of an effort to recruit in the UK.

"Well, good I'd quite like them to make more of an effort to recruit in the UK. So we will be trying to push them as well to do more in the UK. Them and all business so that we make sure we look after people who are otherwise unemployed in the UK better.” 

Legal expert advises Theresa May to file a legal action Brussels regarding the controversial Brexit divorce bill

Legal expert advises Theresa May to file a legal action Brussels regarding the controversial Brexit divorce bill

World Unknown   06:05

Due to the huge financial divorce bill being demanded by the Brussels and denying the UK of taking any part of the EU’s asset it helped to build, the British government has been advised to “call the bluff” of Brussels and seek an independent tribunal to scrutinize the legal basis in which such demands are being made.

This piece of advice was issued by one of Tory barrister Martin Howe QC advising said: “One thing we could say is let’s agree to refer this to an international tribunal as to whether or not there is a legal claim and then it will be decided,” he said.

“It will put paid to any argument that the UK is trying to run away from or dodge its legal obligations.”

“That’s one way that the EU’s bluff could be called.”

Mr Howe, who is a founding member of Lawyers for Britain, a group of lawyers who campaigned for Britain to leave the EU in last year’s referendum, added: “My strong suspicion is that the EU side would never agree to that because they know their legal argument is completely empty.

“So saying that in practice may be just a way of calling their bluff.

“The other reason they wouldn’t agree to it is that they are desperate for the cash immediately.

“A decision five years down the line would not be appealing to them - although you can run these international arbitrations very fast if you want to and certainly within the two year period.”

The legal expert totally condemns such a huge demand which according to him has no legal basis claiming that it is “hard to see any credible basis upon which the UK could be said to be obliged” to pay for the deficit.

He further stressed his position on the issue, after Brussels raised the controversial divorce bill to about £84 billion.

“At the moment I haven’t seen anything of their legal papers explaining their claim so am relying on their public statements but from what I have heard and seen there is no obligation at all.

They add they are concerned that the EU still believe Mrs May won’t walk away in the event of a bad deal – allowing the EU to feel confident enough to ramp up the pressure.

Meanwhile, Zsolt Darvas, of thinktank Bruegel, has also said that the final demand may be far less than the amounts suggested, but then would still be in the tens of billions. The money is said to be owed because of projects Britain committed to which run until 2025. As he said not paying  a penny would make a trade deal practically impossible.

“I can’t see the EU singing a free trade agreement with the UK under those circumstances,” said Mr Darvas.

However, if Britain did end up contributing until 2025, it would entitle it to remain in the single market until that date.

“When you leave a club, you should have full rights during the cancellation period,” he said.

“If the UK is asked to pay the full fee, it should also benefit to single market access, maybe up to 2025.” 

Theresa May to face another Brexit hurdle, as a retired Scottish doctor calls for another referendum

Theresa May to face another Brexit hurdle, as a retired Scottish doctor calls for another referendum

World Unknown   08:34

All seem not to be well with the UK voting to leave the European Union, as fresh warnings are being issued concerning Brexit challenges.

Thus, despite all efforts being made by the Prime Minister to reach the possible deal that will work for all regions of the country in the Brexit negotiations, it has been reported how a retired Scottish doctor has come out to say by law, another referendum on any withdrawal should be allowed.

Dr Andrew’s claim could be a span on the PM’s Brexit wheel, as he has already sent what is regarded as a letter prior to taking any legal action to her.

According to his claim, the Section 2 of the European Union Act 2011 stipulates that that there must be ANOTHER vote on leaving the EU. Meaning that for any treaty that amends the EU to be ratified, the government would have to referendum on concerning it.

 Speaking to the Aberdeen Evening Express Dr Watt said: “The Prime Minister has refused to hold a further referendum on withdrawal from the European Union. She has overlooked the fact that Section 2 of the European Union Act 2011 requires a referendum before the United Kingdom can ratify any withdrawal or related trade agreement with the European Union.

“The Prime Minister’s failure to recognise the legal requirement for a further referendum means that she is at high risk of running out of time in the negotiations with the European Union.”

“Once I have her response I can decide which of the legal issues in the letter before action should be pursued in the High Court.

“At that time I expect to seek to raise funds by crowdfunding or other means to enable this important legal action to go ahead.”

According to the Aberdeen Evening Express the Doctor highlighted a section of the legislation setting out a referendum must be held if there is the “conferring on an EU institution or body of power to impose a requirement or obligation on the United Kingdom, or the removal of any limitation on any such power of an EU institution or body”.

MP Turner representing Isle of Wight who condemned homosexual acts decline contesting the June 8 election

MP Turner representing Isle of Wight who condemned homosexual acts decline contesting the June 8 election

World Unknown   07:17

A member of parliament from the conservative party who stood against homosexual practices and called it “wrong” and "dangerous to society" has declined any intention to contest in the forthcoming general election.

The 63-year-old MP representing the Isle of Wight for the past sixteen years made this known while addressing politics students at Christ the King College in Newport.

In a post on Facebook, student Esther Poucher said she had been "truly shocked" when the MP said he would not be going to a Pride event on the island.

She said: "He told us that he'd been invited, but wasn't intending to go.

"This is because (and this is a direct quote) he thinks that homosexuality is 'wrong' and 'dangerous to society'.

"At this answer, I had to leave."

Ms Poucher added: "Yes, we all believe different things, and that's wonderful. But when that belief treats a group as sub-human, and attempts to take away their fundamental rights, we can't respect it."

Another student who heard the comments, 17-year-old Toby Sheard, said he had been "completely shocked", adding that it was "the right thing for him (Mr Turner) not to stand again".

Mr Turner neither confirmed nor denied making the comments but in a statement said it had been a "privilege to serve the people of the Isle of Wight".

He added that it was time for "a new generation to take up the mantle".

The Conservative leader of Isle of Wight Council, Dave Stewart, said: "I could not condone in any way the comments by Andrew Turner and I feel he is right to stand down.

"Island Conservatives are fielding several candidates in next week's council elections who are gay, and this is most certainly not an opinion that either myself or anyone else in the team of Conservative council candidates would ever support."

Mr Stewart added: "It is very disappointing to hear such comments from someone I know and it is a shame for him to end to his career in this way, but what he said was unacceptable."

In a statement posted on Twitter, Isle of Wight Pride said: "Any person who makes such a statement in a public forum as our MP is dangerous.

"Suicide rates amongst LGBT young people are still disproportionately high.

"Mr Turner did not know if anyone in the room was struggling with their sexuality or gender identity and he does not know how his comments may have impacted on those present."

Theresa May warned by Nicola Sturgeon to keep Britain in the EU single market as GDP plummets

Theresa May warned by Nicola Sturgeon to keep Britain in the EU single market as GDP plummets

World Unknown   06:33

Again First Minister of Scotland Nicola Sturgeon attack flexes muscle with Theresa May over her alleged “very hard” Brexit caused the recent slowdown of the UK’s GDP in the first quarter of this year 2017.

Sturgeon’s attack came after the Office of National Statistics (ONS) announced the 0.3% growth of the GDP, which is far below the 0.7 that was recorded in the previous year’s last quarter.

Though the slow growth of the GDP was being envisaged by some economist, due to the level of inflation in the country that has forced the public to fasten their seatbelt.

Thus, the First Minister seized the opportunity to call on Theresa May to allow the UK to keep membership of the EU single market.

She told Sky News: “I don’t think there’s any doubt we’re starting to see the signs of Brexit on the economy and particularly given Theresa May’s determination not just to take the UK out of the EU… but to pursue a very hard Brexit is having that impact on the economy.

“I think the GDP figures should be setting alarm bells ringing and it underlines the importance of making sure that there are voices there arguing for a common sense outcome.

“We’ve argued that albeit the UK’s leaving the EU, we should be seeking to remain in the single market because that helps to obtain jobs and investment and it’s the best outcome for our economy.”

The ONS said there were falls in “several important consumer-focused industries” including retail sales and accommodation, due in part to prices increasing more than spending.

The trend has been causing consumers a lot of discomfort since the start of 2017, as inflation rises to its highest rate for over three years now.

Also, the squeeze affecting household spending power has been made worse by gloomy retail sales in the UK, as they record their greatest fall for about seven years now.

Richard Berry, the founder of the currency specialists Berry FX, said: “The underwhelming performance of the economy in the first quarter put the Pound on the back foot rather than the canvas.

"Sterling didn't go off a cliff, largely because an anodyne number had been priced in, but the weakest output since before the Referendum has certainly added to the sense of uncertainty."

Britain told not to be deceived about any future relationship with the EU by German Chancellor Angela Merkel

Britain told not to be deceived about any future relationship with the EU by German Chancellor Angela Merkel

World Unknown   06:22

Still upset about the UK leaving the EU, German Chancellor Angela Merkel issues a warning to the UK not to deceive itself concerning any future relationship with the EU while delivering a major to her country’s politicians.

Merkel’s warning came just hours after British PM Theresa May stated her desire to maintain a "deep and special relationship" with the EU, Angela Merkel warned Britain not to be deceived over negotiating any future relationship before Brexit is finalised.

In a warning to the PM, who last night met with EU chief Jean-Claude Juncker and EU negotiator Michel Barnier, Ms Merkel stressed that post-Brexit Britain will not have the same rights as EU members.

To loud applause, she said: “We can only do an agreement on the future relationship with Britain when all questions about its exit have been cleared up satisfactorily.

“A third state, and that's what Britain will be, cannot and will not have at its disposal the same rights... as members of the European Union.

“You may think this is all obvious. But I'm afraid I get the sense some in Britain still have illusions about Brexit - that would be wasted time."

The so-called Brexit bill was also high on the agenda with Ms Merkel saying talks over the future relationship cannot begin without Britain resolving its financial commitments to the crumbling bloc.

Ms Merkel told the German parliament: "We, Germany and the other member states of the EU - did not want this exit. But we respect this decision and are now looking ahead."

She once again maintained the EU27 will put on a unified front and sought to build bridges with Britain, saying Germany does not seek to punish the UK for leaving the bloc.

Ms Merkel added Germany wants to keep close co-operation with the UK on science and security.

Ms Merkel’s comments come hours after the EU's main Brexit negotiator, Mr Barnier, and his British counterpart, David Davis, said the Downing Street meeting was "constructive”.

A spokesman for Mrs May said: “The PM had a constructive meeting this evening with President Juncker of the European Commission."

“Following the UK's letter of notification under Article 50 (on its departure from the EU), she reiterated the UK's commitment to achieving a deep and special partnership with the European Union.”

A spokesman for the European Commission also said: “President Juncker had a constructive meeting with Prime Minister May.” Where” issues of strategic interests” were also discussed

Nonetheless even though Mrs May is trying to strike a conciliatory tone, foreign secretary Boris Johnson stressed Britain will fight to win a good deal. 

Holyrood burst into serious laugh after Nicola stressed that education is her number priority

Holyrood burst into serious laugh after Nicola stressed that education is her number priority

World Unknown   05:59

Drama and confusion takes centre stage in the Scottish Parliament after the First Minister Nicola Sturgeon announced education as her foremost priority for the Scottish people.

The blunder was instigated by Kezia Dugdale after the issue of independence was brought up and also questioned Sturgeon’s educational record for Scotland.

Speaking during First Minister’s Questions, the Scottish Labour leader blasted the SNP for Scotland “declining” in educational attainment.

She said: “The First Minister used to claim education was her number one priority, even she doesn’t claim that anymore.

“After 10 years of SNP government Scottish education is facing challenges like never before, since the SNP took office there are 4,000 fewer teachers, a thousand fewer support staff and class sizes are bigger.

“International studies show Scotland is declining in maths, in reading and in science. [Deputy First Minister] John Swinney's response to this was to publish a mini-manifesto repeating the very promises he’s been breaking every year since 2007.”

Amazingly, when Mrs Sturgeon hit back and insisted “education is my top priority”, the answer sparked a roar of laughter in the chamber.

She continued her speech as the laughter died down and said: “Kezia Dugdale doesn’t like to hear this but that’s why right now across Scotland headteachers and teachers have in their hands £120million of additional funding.

“That’s why local government services are better off to the tune of £400m under this SNP government.”

In a quick reply Ms Dugdale fired back and claimed the Scottish government supposed it would take up to three years to fill 700 teaching vacancies in Scotland, according to leaked documents.

She said: “We all know Nicola Sturgeon will spend the next three years campaigning for independence.

“So can the First Minister really keep a straight face and tell teachers, parents and pupils that once again education is her number one priority?”

Bad news for Nicola Sturgeon as MPs from her party signed to prevent Scotland from rejoining the EU

Bad news for Nicola Sturgeon as MPs from her party signed to prevent Scotland from rejoining the EU

World Unknown   08:30

Nicola Sturgeon seem to have been betrayed by some of her party members. According to sources, top Scotland National Party MPs have given their support to an election pledge that would help to put behind any plan for Scotland to re-join the EU should the region gets the much clamoured independence.

Accordingly, a collection of MPs headed by the SNP’s welfare spokesman Eilidh Whiteford and chief whip Mike Weir have all given their support to the “Brexit Sea of Opportunity” pledge drawn up by the Scottish Fishermen’s Federation (SFF).

They were also committed by the statement to “avoid any policy, practice, regulation or treaty which could return [the UK] to the [EU’s] Common Fisheries (CFP) Policy and the enforced giveaway of almost two thirds of Scottish fish stocks".

The CFP being a no go area in the EU negotiation which was signed by MPs irrespective of their Sturgeon’s demand for another indyref.

The actions taken at the House of Commons has increased the chaos being faced by the SNP as they call for another independence referendum just three years after they lost the last one.

This blow on Sturgeon comes at a time when the SNP seem to be losing popularity in Scotland, with the Tories gaining more grounds.

Surprisingly, the pledge was also signed by Scottish Secretary David Mundell committing the Conservatives and current UK Government to protecting Britain’s fishing stocks from being negotiated away in the Brexit talks after the election.

He said: “I was delighted to sign this pledge the UK is leaving the cfp we will regain control of our fishing and I look forward to working with the industry to turn the Sea of Opportunity into a reality.”

Scottish Conservative MSP Murdo Fraser said: “This is more confusion from the SNP on its position in relation to Europe.

“It likes to pretend that it wants Scotland and the UK to still be part of the EU.

“Yet on one of the key planks of EU policy, its MPs have said they categorically want out.

“The nationalists can’t have it both ways – if you’re in the EU, you have to be in the CFP too.

“It underlines the hypocrisy at the heart of the SNP when it comes to Brexit matters.”

Ukip fisheries spokesman Mike Hookem said: “The rank sordid hypocrisy of the SNP in signing a declaration in support of Scottish fishermen ranks as possibly the most preposterous piece of look what I say not what I do I have ever seen.

“Anybody might think there was an election on and they assume the Scottish voters are stupid, they are not.”

Ms Whiteford insisted that the SNP “have always opposed the common fisheries policy in its current form.”

She was unable to say how Scotland could rejoin the EU and remain outside the fisheries policy, but she appeared to suggest that the party now prefers to only join the single market.

She said: “If you look at Norway and Iceland they are part of the single market but outside the EU and the common fisheries policy.”

Bertie Armstrong, chief executive of the SFF said that the EU’s fishing policy had been a travesty and meant that 60 per cent of Scottish and British fishing stocks had been taken by foreign trawlers.

He said: “Can you imagine if we asked France, Italy or Spain for 60 per cent of their grapes so we can make wine? It would be ridiculous and so is giving up our natural resources.”

Sky News presenter reacts to Labour MP's statement on rights of EU nationals living in the UK

Sky News presenter reacts to Labour MP's statement on rights of EU nationals living in the UK

World Unknown   09:55

Labour MPs rebuked by Adam boulton for insulting the British Prime Minister for her refusal to automatically guarantee the rights of EU nationals living in the Britain.

While rebuking the Labour MP, he also made clear that it was the EU that have refused to see reasons with Theresa May, in trying to ensure the rights of EU nationals and their British counterparts are secured before the triggering of Article 50.

During his chat with Sky News, the representing Feltham and Heston welcomed shadow Brexit secretary Keir Starmer’s proclamation to secure the rights of EU citizens in the UK.

She said: “These are people who are in our public services, running businesses, whose kids go to our schools.”

Boulton, firing back, said: “You’d give the European Union citizens the right to remain here, why should the European Union reciprocate?”

But then Ms Malhotra said it was all about “the tone we set” for negotiating Brexit.

She also said: “Why would you even want to put into play people’s rights who are here working, paying taxes, working in our public services, there’s many other areas in which you can negotiate.”

The host then cut off the politician and blasted: “Because the EU said they wouldn’t agree a deal in advance!” Ms Malhotra in a swift response insisted migrants’ rights should not be up for negotiation.

She said: “I think there are many other areas you can see us having effective negotiations on.

“I think the reality is that a hard Brexit may well lead to hard times. David Davis couldn’t even say what was worse than no deal, nor had he done any economic assessment of the Government’s plans.”

Also Conservative MP John Whittingdale who was on the programme, said Mrs May had been “very clear” on the issue.

He said: “Of course we want people that are already residents and working in this country to go on having the same rights as they’ve had up until now.

“But I’m also very conscious that there’s a great deal of concern and uncertainty amongst the British citizens who are currently living in places like France and Italy and Spain.

“And therefore I think it’s right that we make sure that they’re interests are looked after as well as those European nationals in Britain.”

World Unknown   09:17

Europea Union leaders seem to be unhappy with the frantic efforts being put in place by the British Prime Minister in trying to secure a good deal for the British people who voted to leave the EU.

The latest of such anger is coming from Guy Verhofstadt as he tagged the PM’s electoral process "nonsensical" saying she fixing early election would not in any way guarantee her having advantage during Brexit talks.

Guy Verhofstadt accused Theresa May for making a U-turn on the issue of general election in Britain, saying such a move was engineered by "political opportunism".

According to the one time Belgian prime minister, even if the Conservatives win more seats in parliament, that would not automatically give her the anticipated advantage in the Brexit negotiations.

The EU leader’s statements are likely to infuriate Mrs May, who has maintained that an increased Commons majority would strengthen her hand in the Brexit talks, because it will make it more difficult for the opposition parties at home to obstruct her plans.

Writing in The Observer, Mr Verhofstadt said: "The theory espoused by some, that Theresa May is calling a General Election on Brexit in order to secure a better deal with the EU, is nonsensical.

"Will the election of more Tory MPs give Theresa May a greater chance of securing a better Brexit deal? For those sitting around the table in Brussels, this is an irrelevance."

He added: "Many in Brussels remain concerned that the chances of a deal are being eroded by the British Prime Minister's tough negotiating red lines and her lack of political room for manoeuvre domestically, yet there is no guarantee that a sprinkling of additional Conservative MPs on the backbenches of the House of Commons will provide this.

"Indeed, it appears this election is being driven by the political opportunism of the party in government, rather than by the people they represent."

Survey reveals how Sat Nav/Smartphones could lead UK drivers into trouble

Survey reveals how Sat Nav/Smartphones could lead UK drivers into trouble

World Unknown   05:46

Drivers in the United Kingdom have been warned not to depend too much on their Sat Navs as doing so could cost them some grave consequences.

A new research conducted by uSwitch.com has revealed that using Sat Navs and smartphones for directions while driving is making a lot of drivers to drive dangerously.

The study also found out that about 78 percent of drivers depend so much on their devices, and issued some helpful advice on the speed limit of any road they found themselves in.

In a similar vein, more than half of drivers in the UK agreed that they indeed depend on their devices to tell them of the lawful speed limit.

While some confessed that their devices have made them to engage in dangerous driving, and sometimes going the wrong way down on a one way street, thus posing risks to other road users.

Also, the study shows that 16 percent of drivers position their devices behind the steering wheel, on the passenger seat or close to the gear stick.

Accordingly, any driver caught touching their phone while driving could be penalised with a £200 fine, while those who drive carelessly could be fined £100.

The study also revealed that the most drivers are of the believe that putting in place more road signs assist them to keep to the lawful speed limits. Even though some regulatory changes released in 2016 only have few speed limit signs on the road.

Rod Jones, insurance expert at uSwitch.com, said: “We are officially a nation of Sat Nav junkies, but our addiction to technology is causing us to drive dangerously and risk large fines.

“While Sat Nav and smartphones are an incredibly useful tool for motorists, it is important to remember they are never a complete substitute for knowing the rules of the road.

 “Tougher penalties have already been introduced around handheld device usage that could mean newer drivers losing their licence after a first offence and for all drivers the penalties have increased.

“And drivers will be hit even harder for speeding when the new, heavier, fines come into effect next week.

“It is important to remember not to handle your mobile phone or Sat Nav while driving, no matter how tempting.

“If you need to change your route, having taken a wrong turn, find somewhere safe to park first.”

Theresa May to consider tax increase after June 8 election

Theresa May to consider tax increase after June 8 election

UK Unknown   06:44

Due to the controversies surrounding the Tories attempted efforts to break the promise made in their manifesto not to increase tax, the PM Theresa May has to make the issue of taxation part of her election campaign.

She made this known, during and answer in while in Dudley for her electioneering campaign, and challenged the UK voting public to take a deep look at the Tories’ history as it affects taxation within the past seven years.

While addressing some newsmen, the PM made it clear that the Conservatives "always has been, is, and will continue to be" a party that believes in lower taxes for working people.

According to official record, about four million people have been stopped from paying taxes as a result of government’s policies and regulations, while 31 million people have had their tax bill reduced.

The PM was also asked if her part’s manifesto would include guaranteeing to keep intact the "triple lock" on state pensions that ensures an increase of at least 2.5% every year.

Despite all the pressures pressed on her to comment on the issue, Mrs May again refused to make such a guarantee, but claimed pensioners had become £1,250 better off under the Conservatives, a record which is far higher than what Labour governments of the past had offered annually with a rise of just 75p one year.

In a similar vein, Jeremy Corbyn has sworn to keep the triple lock if a Labour government is elected.

When asked by Sky's Gerard Tubb whether he would promise not to raise VAT or income tax, the Labour leader said: "The Tories are handing £70bn back in tax to big business and corporations.

"We won't do that. We will instead reverse those tax cuts for the corporations and big business in order to fund the social changes we want to bring in this country.

"Our tax burdens will not fall on those with low incomes. They will fall on those with the broadest shoulders who can bear the greatest burden."

The issue of taxation became a serious issue due to Chancellor Hammond’s recent statement while in the US where he said, the UK government could no longer manage the country’s economy effectively, because of the constraints the government is faced with that is caused by the Tories manifesto.

British Prime Minister insists on reducing net migration to the tens of thousands

British Prime Minister insists on reducing net migration to the tens of thousands

World Unknown   06:32

Despite being slammed by the public as a result of her inability to bring net migration below 100,000 as promised by the Tory led government, Theresa May has again insisted that she is committed to that promise.

So far it is not clear, if the controversial net migration issue will still be part of the Conservatives manifesto for the June 8 snap election.

The PM while speaking on the campaign trail in Enfield, in north London, said: "We want to see sustainable net migration in this country.

"I believe that sustainable net migration is in the tens of thousands.

"Leaving the European Union enables us to control our borders in relation to people coming from the EU, as well as those who are coming from outside."

Though while working as the Home Secretary for about six years, the PM over and over failed to bring that to a reality.

Also, the Culture Secretary earlier on, had refused to be drawn on whether the target to get numbers down to "tens of thousands" would be in the manifesto.

She said: "What we need is to have the right people, to attract the brightest and best.

"It's not about putting numbers on it, it's about making sure we can deliver where industries need skills, where the brightest and best want to come to Britain."

Mrs May also seized on apparent confusion within Labour after Jeremy Corbyn was forced to rule out backing a second referendum on the terms of the final Brexit deal having earlier refusing to do so when pressed by.

Seemingly unaware Mr Corbyn had already ruled out a second Brexit vote, she said: "People voted in the referendum last year to leave the European Union.

"That's what the Government needs to put into place and his failure to rule that second referendum out shows the coalition of chaos that we would have under Jeremy Corbyn."

Tories planning to drop the idea of reducing net migration to the tens of thousands, saying it’s not about the number, but quality of people coming into the UK

Tories planning to drop the idea of reducing net migration to the tens of thousands, saying it’s not about the number, but quality of people coming into the UK

World Unknown   07:44

A strong indication has emerged that the promised cut of immigration to the tens of thousands may no longer be feasible, as a plan is being put in place to drop such idea, and that immigration is "not about numbers."

The Culture Secretary Karen Bradly while speaking on the issue declined to mention whether the earlier promised target to bring net immigration to the "tens of thousands" would be in the next manifesto of the Conservative party.

The flagship pledge was used by the Conservatives in previous general elections to lure British voters to get to power, and has been existing for the past seven years which falls within the period Theresa May was in charge of the Home Office without being able to achieve it to date.

According to recent report, the net migration was put at 273,000 as at the end of 2016, which is still far from the promised target.

During her interview with Sky News, Mrs Bradly stated that: "What we need is to have the right people, to attract the brightest and best.

"It's not about putting numbers on it, it's about making sure we can deliver where industries need skills, where brightest and best want to come to Britain; we want to be an attractive place that people want to come and work and we want to be the strong economy that pays for those public services people value so much."

The Culture Secretary further stated that the PM had always made it clear how immigration should be at "sustainable levels" but would not be drawn on what those were. Saying that "This is about getting control of our borders."

In the few weeks, the Conservative manifesto would be released to the public, where it is expected to promise the British voters about the party’s readiness to bring an end to free movement of people post-Brexit.

Conversely, the number of migrants coming from non-EU nations which can be controlled - has been well over 100,000.

Some Tories, including Home Secretary Amber Rudd, are pleading that foreign students at UK universities should be taken out of the target.

Mrs May has constantly vetoed such calls, nevertheless, it report has that she is now preparing to soften her stance on the issue.

According to The Times, she is now offering a compromise, which would see the way student numbers are calculated change.

On the other hand a No 10 source said that any recommendation that foreign students would be removed from the target was "plain wrong".

Speaking to Sky News on Wednesday, Ms Rudd also refused to be drawn on a net migration target figure, saying she was "working on it".

She said one thing that was "absolutely clear" is that they would be "ending the current arrangement on freedom of movement".

She said there were lots of different elements the party hoped to pull together for the manifesto but that she could not say any more on the numbers.

Bravo to the Prime Minister, as the US declares its readiness to enter a trade deal with Britain in the shortest possible time

Bravo to the Prime Minister, as the US declares its readiness to enter a trade deal with Britain in the shortest possible time

World Unknown   06:25

Good news as the speaker of the United States House of Representatives announces the readiness of President Donald Trump to enter into a trade agreement with the British government in the shortest possible time.

This was disclosed during a gathering in central London where Mr Ryan said that the Lawmakers in the US are very ready to work with the President in his bid to enter a bilateral agreement with the government of the United Kingdom.

Thus, the Prime Minister’s efforts in securing good deals for the British people post-Brexit has been bolstered further with such an announcement, even as Brussels has taken the first leap in entering a negotiating stance with the UK in  the soon to start Brexit negotiations

Delivering a speech for the Policy Exchange think-tank, Mr Ryan said: "Now that Article 50 has been invoked, the UK and the EU will determine the best path forward over the course of these negotiations.

"We want the parties to come together and strike a lasting agreement, a strong UK-EU relationship is in all of our best interests.

"In that same vein, the United States will work closely with our EU friends and chart a path forward on TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership) negotiations.

"At the same time we are committed to working with President Trump and your Government to achieve a bilateral trade agreement between the United States and Britain.

"This is one of the bipartisan messages I bring with me, I bring Democrats and Republicans here to this room to this country today, to say that the United States stands ready to forge a new trade agreement with Great Britain as soon as possible so that we may further tap into the great potential between our two people."

Just two months ago Ted Poe, the chairman of the congressional foreign affairs committee heralded the "special relationship" between the two nations, calling a bilateral trade deal an opportunity to "deepen our alliance even further".

And he claimed the possibilities of the deal being entered into within a period of two years - as the UK fights it out with the European Union following the triggering of Article 50.

However, following Mr Ryan’s announcement during a visit to the Chancellor Philip Hammond in Downing Street, it is seems apparent that President Trump is ready to make it happen in less than two years

Mr Ryan also said he cannot imagine Britain being unable to agree a trade deal with the EU even after Brexit negotiations have concluded.